Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463609›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Review of Deep Learning Approaches Based on Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentation.

Dina Koishiyeva, Dinargul Mukhammejanova, Jeong Won Kang, Assel Mukasheva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dina KoishiyevaSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0008-1204-797X
Dinargul MukhammejanovaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Kazakh National University Named After Al-Farabi, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0009-7476-6731
Jeong Won KangDepartment of Transportation System Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Uiwang 27469, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-8005
Assel MukashevaSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9890-4910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation has undergone significant changes in recent years, mainly due to the development of base models. The introduction of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) represents a major shift from task-specific architectures to universal architectures. This review discusses the adaptation of SAM in medical visualisation, focusing on three primary domains. Firstly, multimodal fusion frameworks implement semantic alignment of heterogeneous visual methods. Secondly, volumetric extensions transition from slice-based processing to native 3D spatial reasoning with architectures such as SAM3D, ProtoSAM-3D, and VISTA3D. Thirdly, uncertainty-aware architectures integrate probabilistic calibration for clinical interpretability, as illustrated by the SAM-U and E-Bayes SAM models. A comparative analysis reveals that SAM derivatives with effective parameters achieve Dice coefficients of 81-95%, while concomitantly reducing annotation requirements by 56-73%. Future research directions include incorporating adaptive domain hints, Bayesian self-correction mechanisms, and unified volumetric frameworks to enable autonomous generalisation across diverse medical imaging contexts.

Indexed as

domain adaptationhybrid architecturesmedical segmentationsegment anything modeltuning

Identifiers

PMID41463609
PMCPMC12729286

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.