ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Review of Deep Learning Approaches Based on Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentation.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning and Foundation Models for Early Detection and Forecasting of Plant Diseases.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical image segmentation has undergone significant changes in recent years, mainly due to the development of base models. The introduction of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) represents a major shift from task-specific architectures to universal architectures. This review discusses the adaptation of SAM in medical visualisation, focusing on three primary domains. Firstly, multimodal fusion frameworks implement semantic alignment of heterogeneous visual methods. Secondly, volumetric extensions transition from slice-based processing to native 3D spatial reasoning with architectures such as SAM3D, ProtoSAM-3D, and VISTA3D. Thirdly, uncertainty-aware architectures integrate probabilistic calibration for clinical interpretability, as illustrated by the SAM-U and E-Bayes SAM models. A comparative analysis reveals that SAM derivatives with effective parameters achieve Dice coefficients of 81-95%, while concomitantly reducing annotation requirements by 56-73%. Future research directions include incorporating adaptive domain hints, Bayesian self-correction mechanisms, and unified volumetric frameworks to enable autonomous generalisation across diverse medical imaging contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.