ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Integrating Foundation Model Features into Graph Neural Network and Fusing Predictions with Standard Fine-Tuned Models for Histology Image Classification.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Special Issue on "Machine Learning-Aided Medical Image Analysis".Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histopathological image classification using computational methods such as fine-tuned convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has gained significant attention in recent years. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have also emerged as strong alternatives, often employing CNNs or vision transformers (ViTs) as node feature extractors. However, as these models are usually pre-trained on small-scale natural image datasets, their performance in histopathology tasks can be limited. The introduction of foundation models trained on large-scale histopathological data now enables more effective feature extraction for GNNs. In this work, we integrate recently developed foundation models as feature extractors within a lightweight GNN and compare their performance with standard fine-tuned CNN and ViT models. Furthermore, we explore a prediction fusion approach that combines the outputs of the best-performing GNN and fine-tuned model to evaluate the benefits of complementary representations. Results demonstrate that GNNs utilizing foundation model features outperform those trained with CNN or ViT features and achieve performance comparable to standard fine-tuned CNN and ViT models. The highest overall performance is obtained with the proposed prediction fusion strategy. Evaluated on three publicly available datasets, the best fusion achieved F1-scores of 98.04%, 96.51%, and 98.28%, and balanced accuracies of 98.03%, 96.50%, and 97.50% on PanNuke, BACH, and BreakHis, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.