ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Technical Validation of a Multimodal Cognitive-Haptic Sudoku Platform Under Simulated Tremor Conditions.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurological disorders such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases often involve overlapping motor and cognitive impairments that motivate integrated rehabilitation approaches. This study presents the technical validation of a dual-modality rehabilitation platform that combines haptic-based motor interaction with cognitive engagement through an adaptive Sudoku task in healthy adults under simulated tremor conditions. The system integrates a real-time tremor-filtering pipeline based on discrete wavelet denoising, Kalman smoothing, and wavelet packet decomposition, designed to attenuate high-frequency oscillations while preserving voluntary motion. The preclinical evaluation was carried out in two stages: (i) technical validation with healthy adults performing a standardized cognitive-haptic task under three conditions (no tremor, simulated tremor without filtering, simulated tremor with filtering) and (ii) extended usability testing with older participants without diagnosed neurological disorders. Quantitative evaluation focused on latency, performance degradation under simulated tremor, and partial restoration with filtering, while usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The platform achieved low end-to-end latency (41.4 ± 1.4 ms) and high usability (overall mean SUS = 81.4 ± 6.2), indicating stable performance and positive user feedback. Filtering significantly improved performance compared with unfiltered tremor but did not fully restore baseline performance, highlighting the current algorithm as a first-step compensation strategy rather than a complete solution. This work therefore demonstrates technical feasibility and interaction performance in healthy participants under simulated tremor; it does not assess clinical effectiveness and is intended to inform subsequent patient studies in populations with neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.