ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Fundus Photography with SS-OCT Images in Justifying Prophylactic Laser Photocoagulation of Peripheral Retinal Lesions.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Preoperative Imaging in Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Emerging Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights for Clinical Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to validate the feasibility of combining ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus photography with targeted swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for clinical decision-making regarding a prophylactic laser therapy. For this purpose we enrolled 119 patients (135 eyes) who, basis on fundus examination, were eligible for prophylactic photocoagulation of degenerative retinal lesions. Eyes were classified into two groups: (1) justified laser, when SS-OCT confirmed vitreoretinal traction and/or subretinal fluid beneath the neurosensory retina; and (2) non-justified laser, when SS-OCT did not confirm these criteria. Using this SS-OCT-guided UWF approach, we found that 25.1% of eyes that initially qualified for laser based on clinical examination did not meet the SS-OCT criteria. Patients in the justified laser group were significantly younger than those in the non-justified group. Horseshoe retinal tears, lattice degeneration and snail-track degenerations, multiple lesions, and lesions located in the far and mid-periphery were significantly more frequent in the justified laser group than in the non-justified group. By contrast, the prevalence of operculated holes, bilateral lesions, and degenerative lesions in patients with a retinal detachment in the fellow eye did not differ between groups. Our findings suggest the SS-OCT-guided UWF imaging may refine patient selection for prophylactic laser therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.