Evidence mapPaperPMID 41463672Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Pupillary Hippus as a Biomarker: Spectral Signatures and Complexity Approaches in Autonomic and Clinical Contexts.

Vincenzo Rizzuto, Marco Laurino, Roberto Montanari, Angelo Gemignani, Michele Figus, Giuseppe Covello, Niccolò Candelise, Davide Borroni, Guna Laganovska, Luca Mesin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vincenzo RizzutoInternational School of Advanced Studies, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-4641-3267
Marco LaurinoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4798-5196
Roberto MontanariInstitute of Pharmacology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4331-8460
Angelo GemignaniDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Michele FigusDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-9033
Giuseppe CovelloDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-2032
Niccolò CandeliseIndependent Researcher, 00162 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5086-3996
Davide BorroniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Guna LaganovskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-350X
Luca MesinMathematical Biology and Physiology, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-2348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pupillary hippus, i.e., the spontaneous bilateral oscillation of pupil diameter under constant illumination, provides a non-invasive window into autonomic and central nervous system dynamics. Despite decades of research, a unified framework linking its spectral features, physiological underpinnings, and analytical complexity is still missing. In this narrative review, we synthesize spectral and nonlinear pupillometry studies to propose a paradigm-aware taxonomy of hippus frequency bands that integrates evidence from autonomic tests and cognitive-arousal paradigms. Across the literature, low-frequency components tend to covary with respiratory/vasomotor autonomic rhythms, while higher-frequency fluctuations and complexity indices are more sensitive to cognitive load, visual fatigue, and pathological states but remain methodologically heterogeneous. Finally, we explore contexts in which hippus-based biomarkers show clinical potential, with a main focus on glaucoma as an emerging translational model, while underscoring the methodological and translational gaps that currently hinder their validation and routine clinical adoption. Physiology, spectral metrics, and complexity-based analyses are integrated to lay the foundations of a coherent framework.

Indexed as

autonomic biomarkersclinical applicationscomplexityentropyfrequency bandsglaucomapupillary hippuspupillary unrestpupillometryspectral analysis

Identifiers

PMID41463672
PMCPMC12729395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.