ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nano-antimicrobial peptides (Nano-AMPs) to combat resistant gram-negative bacteria.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- WHO Critical Priority Fungi: A Comprehensive Review of Antifungal Resistance, Emerging Therapeutic Strategies, and the Potential of Antifungal Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Plant-Derived Peptide-Polymer Therapeutics for Cutaneous Infections and Inflammation: Mechanistic Basis, Delivery Design and Translational Considerations.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Review
- A leakage-aware genomic prediction pipeline for meropenem resistance inBioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides Against Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria: Focus on Machine Learning.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Bacteriocins fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a major health crisis worldwide, and it is expected to surpass cancer as one of the leading causes of death by 2050. Conventional antibiotics are struggling to keep pace with the rapidly evolving resistance trends, underscoring the urgent need for novel antimicrobial therapeutic strategies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) function through diverse, often membrane-disrupting mechanisms that can address the latest challenges to resistance. However, the identification, prediction, and optimization of novel AMPs can be impeded by several issues, including extensive sequence spaces, context-dependent activity, and the higher costs associated with wet laboratory screenings. Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled large-scale mining of genomes, metagenomes, and quantitative species-resolved activity prediction, i.e., MIC, and de novo AMPs designed with integrated stability and toxicity filters. The current review has synthesized and highlighted progress across different discriminative models, such as classical machine learning and deep learning models and transformer embeddings, alongside graphs and geometric encoders, structure-guided and multi-modal hybrid learning approaches, closed-loop generative methods, and large language models (LLMs) predicted frameworks. This review compares models' benchmark performances, highlighting AI-predicted novel hybrid approaches for designing AMPs, validated by in vitro and in vivo methods against clinical and resistant pathogens to increase overall experimental hit rates. Based on observations, multimodal paradigm strategies are proposed, focusing on identification, prediction, and characterization, followed by design frameworks, linking active-learning lab cycles, mechanistic interpretability, curated data resources, and uncertainty estimation. Therefore, for reproducible benchmarks and interoperable data, collaborative computational and wet lab experimental validations must be required to accelerate AI-driven novel AMP discovery to combat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.