Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463921›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Diet Acceptance and Utilization Responses to Increasing Doses of Thymol in Beef Steers Consuming Forage.

Emma P Fukuda, Jordan P Suter, Russell W Jessup, Merritt L Drewery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma P FukudaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Texas State University, 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-4730-099X
Jordan P SuterDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Texas State University, 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.
Russell W JessupDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Texas A&M University, 400 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4951-4814
Merritt L DreweryDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Texas State University, 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3558-9532

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-77040-34881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thymol is an antimicrobial terpene with potential as a feed additive for cattle; however, in vivo data describing the response of forage-fed beef cattle to the increasing provision of thymol is limited. As thymol may affect palatability and exert antimicrobial effects on rumen microbes, defining its effects in vivo is critical to inform adoption. Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to evaluate cattle acceptance of thymol and characterize the effects of increasing thymol doses on diet utilization and ruminal fermentation, with the overarching goal of identifying a maximum tolerable dose for beef cattle. Two 4 × 4 Latin Square experiments were conducted using beef steers consuming forage and providing thymol dosed on alfalfa. Experiment 1 assessed acceptance of thymol at increasing concentrations (0, 110, 220, and 330 mg/kg intake), and experiment 2 assessed diet utilization and fermentation in response to one of four thymol doses: 0, 120, 240, and 480 mg/kg intake. For experiment 1, thymol dose did not affect treatment or forage intake (

Indexed as

beef cattleessential oilsfeed additivesmethanesecondary plant metabolitessustainability

Identifiers

PMID41463921
PMCPMC12729586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.