ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
One Size Doesn't Fit All: Variability in Autistic Children's Response to Pivotal Response Treatment.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) is a naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention designed to strengthen autistic children's social communication skills. Few studies have examined which children benefit the most from PRT and which characteristics are associated with meaningful progress. We analyzed data from 23 children with autism and significant language delay who had been randomized to receive PRT in a previously completed 24-week randomized controlled trial of parent training and clinician-delivered intervention. Participants were categorized as intervention responders and non-responders based on the demonstration of meaningful improvement (or lack thereof) in social communication using the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MCDI) Reliable Change index scores and clinician determination based on review of language samples and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale (CGI). Baseline child characteristics associated with being a responder were assessed. Sixteen participants were responders on the language sample, ten on the MCDI, and sixteen on the CGI. Nine were consistent responders across all three measures; six were consistent non-responders. Verbal ability at baseline was associated with being a responder across all measures. In our small sample, baseline verbal ability was associated with being a responder to PRT, though categorization as a responder differed somewhat based on outcome measure. Future research should explore responder profiles specifically in children who are nonspeaking to inform the development of more effective supports for this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.