Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463973›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

One Size Doesn't Fit All: Variability in Autistic Children's Response to Pivotal Response Treatment.

Rachel K Schuck, Ella Jevtić, Emily F Ferguson, Maria Estefania Millan, Devon M Slap, Mirko Uljarević, Jennifer M Phillips, Antonio Y Hardan, Grace W Gengoux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel K SchuckDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-1223
Ella JevtićDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Emily F FergusonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2771-6346
Maria Estefania MillanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Devon M SlapDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mirko UljarevićDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jennifer M PhillipsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Antonio Y HardanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Grace W GengouxDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-9513

Funding

NIDCD NIH HHS DC01368902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) is a naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention designed to strengthen autistic children's social communication skills. Few studies have examined which children benefit the most from PRT and which characteristics are associated with meaningful progress. We analyzed data from 23 children with autism and significant language delay who had been randomized to receive PRT in a previously completed 24-week randomized controlled trial of parent training and clinician-delivered intervention. Participants were categorized as intervention responders and non-responders based on the demonstration of meaningful improvement (or lack thereof) in social communication using the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MCDI) Reliable Change index scores and clinician determination based on review of language samples and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale (CGI). Baseline child characteristics associated with being a responder were assessed. Sixteen participants were responders on the language sample, ten on the MCDI, and sixteen on the CGI. Nine were consistent responders across all three measures; six were consistent non-responders. Verbal ability at baseline was associated with being a responder across all measures. In our small sample, baseline verbal ability was associated with being a responder to PRT, though categorization as a responder differed somewhat based on outcome measure. Future research should explore responder profiles specifically in children who are nonspeaking to inform the development of more effective supports for this group.

Indexed as

autismlanguagepivotal response treatmentreliable change indexresponse to intervention

Identifiers

PMID41463973
PMCPMC12729598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.