ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Specialised Competencies and Artificial Intelligence in Perioperative Care: Contributions Toward Safer Practice.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This narrative review explores how specialised clinical competencies and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies converge in the context of perioperative care, with a focus on their combined potential to improve patient safety. Considering the growing complexity of surgical care and rising demands on healthcare professionals, the study aims to understand how human expertise and digital tools can complement each other in this high-stakes environment. Methods: A narrative review methodology was adopted to integrate insights from diverse sources, including empirical studies, policy documents, and expert analyses published over the last decade. Findings reveal that AI can support clinical decision-making, streamline workflows, and enable earlier identification of complications across all perioperative phases. These technologies enhance, rather than replace, the roles of nurses, anesthetists, and surgeons. However, their effective use depends on critical factors such as digital literacy, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ethical awareness. Issues related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unequal access to technology highlight the need for thoughtful, inclusive implementation. The future of perioperative care will likely depend on hybrid models where human judgment and AI-based tools are integrated in ways that uphold safety, equity, and person-centred values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.