ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Physical Activity Assessment-Self-Reported Versus Pedometer-Measured, and Associations with Health Markers Among University Students in South Africa.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate measurement of physical activity is crucial for promoting health and preventing non-communicable diseases, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the dual burden of infectious and chronic diseases presents significant public health challenges. While self-reported tools are commonly used, they are often limited by recall and social desirability biases. This study aimed to compare self-reported physical activity with objectively measured pedometer data and explore their associations with fitness and anthropometric indicators among university students. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 full-time students at a South African university. The study was conducted in two phases: For phase 1, participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). For phase two, participants wore pedometers for seven consecutive days to measure total and aerobic step counts. Fitness was assessed using the Harvard Step Test to calculate the Physical Efficiency Index (PEI), and anthropometric data (BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage) were recorded. Statistical analyses included Spearman's correlations, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and multivariable linear regression. While 83.3% of participants self-reported high physical activity levels, pedometer data indicated that 61.7% accumulated fewer than 1500 aerobic steps per day and 53.3% recorded fewer than 5000 total steps. No significant association was found between self-reported activity and pedometer-measured steps (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.