ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
HPV Vaccine: An Effective but Underutilized Prevention Tool.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HPV vaccines are among the most effective vaccines available, offering safe administration and high cost-effectiveness. The composition of the vaccines has been changed, involving enrichment with pathogenic strains and extending the possibility of prevention to other HPV-related cancers and diseases. The efficacy of the vaccine extends beyond primary prevention due to documented reductions in the relapse of cervical lesions. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether there were differences in the frequency of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (H-SILs) and cervical carcinoma between vaccinated and unvaccinated women. This retrospective study included all incident cases of cervical cancer or H-SIL diagnosed between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2020, in Catania, Italy. We analyzed 2722 cases: 751 cervical cancers and 1901 H-SILs. A total of 88% of patients had never been vaccinated. Among women with H-SILs, 85% had never received a vaccination against HPV. Among the few women with H-SILs who were vaccinated, 3.5% of them received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine before diagnosis, while 96.5% started the HPV vaccine cycle after diagnosis of cervical lesions. The mean age at diagnosis for our population was 43.4 years (52 years for cervical cancer; 39.8 years for H-SIL). Statistically significant differences were found between vaccinated and unvaccinated women. The HPV vaccine is an underutilized intervention that has the potential to eradicate cervical cancer and reduce the occurrence of other HPV-related cancers. Implementing new communication strategies can increase the number of vaccinated subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.