Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41464870›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Frailty-Informed Decision Making During Acute Health Crises: A Competency-Based Framework for Person-Centered Care.

Paige Moorhouse, Laurie H Mallery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paige MoorhouseCentre for Health Care of the Elderly, Dalhousie University, 5595 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-2499-8639
Laurie H MalleryCentre for Health Care of the Elderly, Dalhousie University, 5595 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty profoundly influences the risks, benefits, and outcomes of medical care, yet clinical decision making during an acute health crisis is often driven by single-system treatment paradigms rather than a holistic understanding of patient values, prognosis, and personhood. This review outlines a practical, competency-based framework to guide clinicians through key clinical tasks that reliably align treatment decisions with what matters most to individuals living with frailty. The approach distinguishes between interventions that remain medically reasonable versus those that are unlikely to provide benefit and acknowledges that appropriate treatments evolve as frailty progresses. Anchoring the framework is an emphasis on dignity and the preservation of personhood through every stage of care. Much like a clinical procedure, these clinical tasks require defined intent, structured steps, and practice to ensure competence. When performed skillfully, these tasks may reduce low-value interventions, support autonomy, and promote compassionate, goal-concordant care during the most challenging moments of aging.

Indexed as

advance care planningdignity-conserving carefrailtygoals-of-care discussionsshared decision makingsubstitute decision making

Identifiers

PMID41464870
PMCPMC12733581

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.