ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Protein Fortification of Millet-Based Gluten-Free Snacks Designed for 3D Printing.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global trend in gluten-free snack innovation involves using naturally gluten-free grains as a nutrient-rich foundation, enriching formulations with multifunctional plant and microbial proteins, and optimizing ingredient interactions to balance nutritional demands with structural integrity. The study demonstrates that blending proso millet flour with yeast-derived and almond (50:50 ratio) proteins effectively produces a protein- and fiber-rich gluten-free dough suitable for 3D printing, without the need for synthetic additives. This approach aligns with the growing demand for clean-label, sustainable protein sources that enable the creation of healthy, stable, and appealing ready-to-eat snacks. The enriched dough demonstrated superior rheological behavior, characterized by a dominant elastic modulus (G' > G″), enabling smooth extrusion and stable shape retention. Nutritional analysis revealed an increase in protein (28.16 vs. 13.26 g/100 g DB) and dietary fiber (12.17 vs. 6.22 g/100 g DB) compared to the control. The amino acid profile improved significantly, with 48% more essential amino acids and a 63% increase in non-essential amino acids. Dimensional accuracy improved, and post-processing deformation was reduced, confirming enhanced structural integrity. Texture analysis showed no significant increase in hardness, maintaining a desirable texture profile despite higher protein content. Sensory evaluation confirmed greater acceptance of the enriched snack, especially in terms of flavor, aroma, and smell, while preliminary cost assessment indicated that, despite higher ingredient costs, the enriched formulation remains economically feasible. Additional optimization of protein concentration and processing conditions could enhance the overall functionality even further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.