Evidence mapPaperPMID 41465068Full record

ReviewGenes2025

A Single-Cell Omics Technical Guide for Advancing Neuropsychiatric Research.

Kayleigh Casmey, Maria Zimmermann, Yuxin Xie, Sierra A Codeluppi-Arrowsmith, Gustavo Turecki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kayleigh CasmeyMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-0539-7624
Maria ZimmermannMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7752-5014
Yuxin XieMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.
Sierra A Codeluppi-ArrowsmithMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9347-7523
Gustavo TureckiMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-2736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell omics technology has advanced rapidly since its inception, offering increasing precision, resolution, and technical diversity to explore cell-specific molecular features in the human brain and neuropsychiatric disorders. While traditional bulk genomic analyses have provided valuable insights into the molecular processes of these disorders, single-cell omics allows for the investigation of cellular heterogeneity in the brain, which is crucial for dissecting underlying pathology. Neuropsychiatric disorders-such as dementia and depression-are complex and heterogenous brain disorders driven by intricate interactions of genetic and environmental factors. Methodological developments in single-cell omic technologies have enabled their application directly to human brain tissue for the study of neuropsychiatric disorders, yielding cell-specific insights in transcriptomics and epigenomics, with emerging findings in proteomics, metabolomics, multi-omics, and beyond. This review discusses different single-cell omic technologies, focusing on their application to postmortem human brain tissue, highlighting key findings from the use of these methods in neuropsychiatric disorders, and providing considerations for future implementation to elucidate the molecular landscape of brain changes associated with these conditions.

Indexed as

GenomicsMental DisordersProteomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisBrainEpigenomicsHumansMetabolomicsTranscriptomehuman brainneuropsychiatric disorderssingle-cell omics

Identifiers

PMID41465068
PMCPMC12733151

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.