ReviewGenes2025
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Design of Antisense Oligonucleotides for Precision Medicine in Neuromuscular Disorders.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and toxicity assessment of antisense oligonucleotides in brain-relevant human cellular models.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Bridging technical innovation and computational advances in studies of RNA-protein assemblies.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare neuromuscular disorders impose a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and the health care system, yet, effective disease-modifying therapies remain limited. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy, enabling targeted modulation of gene expression through mechanisms such as exon skipping, exon inclusion, and transcript degradation. However, the clinical efficacy of currently approved ASO therapies is often suboptimal. This limitation reflects not only poor target tissue uptake and delivery barriers, but also suboptimal design of ASO sequences and chemical modification patterns, which can compromise potency, safety, and translational robustness. Recent advances in machine learning have led to the development of ASO optimization platforms such as eSkipFinder and ASOptimizer, which aim to predict effective ASO sequences and chemistries for specific RNA targets. While these tools show considerable promise, their broader applicability remains limited due to a lack of comprehensive validation and the absence of integrated safety considerations. Further refinement and validation are necessary to improve their translational utility. Nevertheless, such platforms represent a critical advancement toward accelerating ASO development. By improving design precision, reducing reliance on extensive preclinical screening, and enabling researchers with limited ASO experience to generate optimized candidates, machine learning is poised to accelerate the development and clinical translation of ASO therapies for rare neuromuscular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.