ReviewGenes2025
17q12 Recurrent Deletion Syndrome in Childhood.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A familial case report of 17q12 recurrent deletion syndrome: clinical and molecular characterization.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 17q12 recurrent deletion syndrome is a genomic disorder encompassing a 1.4 to 1.5 Mb region that includes the HNF1B gene, and it manifests with remarkable phenotypic variability. Renal anomalies, endocrine and metabolic disturbances, and neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders are recurrent features, although penetrance and severity differ widely between patients.
methodsWe reviewed the literature on the molecular basis, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and management of 17q12 deletion syndrome, and we illustrate the variability of this condition through two contrasting paediatric cases.
resultsThe cases concern three siblings harbouring the same familial deletion, who nevertheless exhibited striking intrafamilial variability, ranging from renal and neurodevelopmental features to multisystemic involvement. These cases exemplify both extremes of the syndrome and highlight the challenges of clinical prognostication.
conclusionsThe review and cases emphasise the importance of early genetic testing in paediatric renal anomalies, the necessity of multidisciplinary surveillance even in asymptomatic individuals, and the relevance of 17q12 deletion as a model of variable expressivity in genomic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.