ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and, in particular, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) transformed the management of male infertility by making fertility possible in previously untreatable cases. However, the bypassing of natural selection mechanisms at fertilization is fraught with the danger of transmission of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities. Male infertility is now a multifactorial disorder with notable contributions from single-gene defects, chromosomal abnormalities, and Y-chromosome microdeletions. The recent advances in next-generation sequencing and sperm omics have identified mutations and copy-number variations in genes critical for spermatogenesis, flagellar structure, and endocrine regulation. Along with these findings, an increasing body of evidence suggests that ART procedures can lead to a disruption of epigenetic reprogramming during gametogenesis and early embryogenesis, resulting in imprinting disorders and altered patterns of gene expression in the offspring. This review synthesizes recent progress in the molecular underpinnings of genetic and epigenetic hazards of ART, with an emphasis on clinical significance for reproductive counselling and ethical considerations for future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.