Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465539›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

How Laboratory Guidelines Promote the Validity of Circulating Extracellular Vesicle-Associated Nucleic Acid Biomarker Signatures in Liquid Biopsy.

Michael W Pfaffl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael W PfafflAnimal Physiology and Immunology, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Straße 1, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-1019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating nucleic acids, particularly those associated with extracellular vesicles (EVs), represent a promising class of molecular biomarkers in liquid biopsy for 'non-invasive' disease diagnostics, for better prognosis, and for therapeutic monitoring. However, the translation of this new circulating biomarker source into clinical practice is mostly hindered by methodological variability and a lack of standardization across the analytical workflow. This article highlights the implementation of international academic guidelines, such as Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) and Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV), in the entire analytical procedure in promoting the integrity, reproducibility, and validity of EV-associated nucleic acid markers in molecular diagnostics. By standardizing the liquid biopsy workflow from tissue sampling up to data analysis and statistics, these established guidelines lay the necessary scientific basis for a robust, reproducible, reliable, and valid RNA and DNA biomarker discovery in EVs. The ultimate goal is the successful implementation of the developed biomarker signature into the clinical diagnostic routine, but this requires further rounds of rigorous validation. The regularly updated guidelines should not be seen as optional recommendations, but more like an essential pillars of scientific rigor and standardization in order to achieve better and biological meaningful biomarker results in liquid biopsy.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsExtracellular VesiclesLiquid BiopsyBiomarkersDNAHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNABiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNARNAbiomarker developmentextracellular vesiclesliquid biopsyMIQEMISEVqPCRreproducibilityRT-qPCRvalidity

Identifiers

PMID41465539
PMCPMC12733191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.