ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Memory in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of mental health symptoms on relational memory performance.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory constitutes a fundamental cognitive domain, and converging evidence suggests that its dysfunction represents a prominent, though not exclusive, transdiagnostic dimension across major psychiatric disorders. This review aimed to integrate neurobiological, cognitive, and clinical evidence on domain-specific memory impairments in mood, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, post-traumatic stress, and psychotic disorders. A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2025 for peer-reviewed studies examining short-term, working, long-term, episodic, semantic, and prospective memory, prioritizing both landmark and recent contributions. Two recurrent transdiagnostic patterns emerged: (i) consistent impairments in working-memory control, and (ii) reduced episodic/autobiographical specificity, while procedural memory appeared relatively preserved. Disorder-specific profiles include overgeneral autobiographical memory in major depression, enduring working and episodic deficits in bipolar disorder, variable impairments in anxiety disorders, functional rather than structural memory inefficiencies in obsessive-compulsive disorder, broad mnemonic disorganization in post-traumatic stress disorder, and pervasive working and episodic deficits in schizophrenia and related psychoses. Across conditions, converging neurobiological data implicate fronto-hippocampal dysconnectivity, altered plasticity, and impaired consolidation processes. Unlike previous reviews, this work syntetisizes evidence across multiple memory systems and across major psychiatric categories, linking neurobiological mechanisms with cognitive and clinical manifestations to support a dimensional, transdiagnostic interpretation of memory dysfunction. These findings could suggest that memory dysfunction represents a recurrent and clinically relevant dimension across psychiatric conditions, warranting further mechanistic and longitudinal investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.