Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465912›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Trends and hotspots in global halitosis research: A bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2025.

Zhulin Wu, Wanjun Tan, Tingting Wang, Tong Ke, Fen Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhulin WuPeople's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7727-0119
Wanjun TanThe Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Tingting WangPeople's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Tong KePeople's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Fen LiuShenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0009-0001-0587-7501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to utilize bibliometric methods to examine the global English-language literature on halitosis, with the goal of identifying research hotspots and suggesting potential future research directions in this field.

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted for literature related to halitosis, spanning from January 2010 to July 2025. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the Medpulse database and the R software package bibliometrix, including statistical analysis of literature data, as well as topic and co-occurrence analyses.

resultsThe analysis included a total of 1634 articles, representing contributions from corresponding authors across 19 countries, with China and the USA leading in publication output. There has been a consistent annual increase in publications related to halitosis. Japanese institutions and authors are particularly active, with their frequent publications contributing to their influence and prominence in this field. Fukuoka Dental College emerged as the institution with the highest number of publications. The majority of these articles are published in journals dedicated to oral health. Key topics of study include halitosis, oral health, oral malodor, periodontitis, probiotics, oral hygiene, volatile sulfur compounds, periodontal disease, and quality of life, etc. Thematic evolution analysis indicates that oral diseases and research involving children remain promising areas for future investigation.

conclusionBibliometric analysis indicates that the diagnosis and treatment of halitosis, along with research focused on pediatric populations and multidisciplinary approaches, have emerged as recent research hotspots and directions in the field.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiomedical ResearchHalitosisHumansOral Healthbibliometricshalitosismultidisciplinaryoral diseasesprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID41465912
PMCPMC12746953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.