SynthesisPediatric research2025
An assessment of methods for measuring body composition in full-term infants: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous methods are available for measuring body composition in infants, however, there is no consensus on which approach is preferred. The aim of this study was to identify one such method for a clinical and research setting.
methodsA systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify studies that investigated the accuracy of body composition methods in full-term infants up to 2 years of age.
resultsThirty out of 6643 identified records were included. Several anthropometric equations were investigated with inconsistent results. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) showed more comparable results to those assessed by air displacement plethysmography (ADP), when applying new techniques. Few studies assessed the accuracy of quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR), isotope dilution, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR); nonetheless, they all performed well against reference methods. ADP showed agreement compared to deuterium dilution, 3-compartment-, and 4-compartment-models on group-level; however, there were discrepancies when compared to DXA.
conclusionsAnthropometry, DXA, BIA, and ultrasound showed varying results, highlighting the need for further research. QMR, isotope dilution, and NIR appeared promising, but evidence is limited due to few studies. ADP showed consistently small bias compared to multi-component models and isotope dilution. IMPACT: Accurate body composition assessment in infancy has the potential to improve prophylactic actions against obesity. There is relative consensus on the most accurate body composition assessment in pre-term infants in a research setting, however, this consensus has not been available for full-term infants until now. Measure of anthropometry performs with varying precision, suggesting very low feasibility of the method for body composition assessment. From a research perspective, air displacement plethysmography is an accurate method for measuring body composition in full-term infants. This systematic review identifies research gaps within the scientific field of infant body composition.
Identifiers
41466147What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.