Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466909›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Flash Pulmonary Oedema in a Patient With Unilateral Renal Artery Stenosis and Preserved Contralateral Function: A Medically Managed Case Report.

Mohamad Abu Zaher, Ching Lee, Sumith Abeygunasekar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamad Abu ZaherNephrology, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, GBR.
Ching LeeNephrology, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, GBR.
Sumith AbeygunasekarNephrology, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flash pulmonary oedema (Pickering phenotype) is a high-risk, under-recognised manifestation of renovascular disease. A man in his 50s presented with abrupt dyspnoea, hypertensive crisis, type 1 respiratory failure, and pulmonary oedema. His response to intravenous diuretics was limited, and he was stabilised in the ICU with glyceryl trinitrate and continuous positive airway pressure. Ultrasound showed a small scarred right kidney of 7.9 cm. Echocardiography found a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25% at presentation. Three months later, cardiac MRI showed LVEF of 40% with diffuse mid-wall scarring. Renal MR angiography (MRA) confirmed severe ostial right renal artery stenosis, and dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) demonstrated a split kidney function of 36% in the right and 64% in the left. A medical-first strategy was chosen after multidisciplinary discussion, with no recurrent episodes of pulmonary oedema during follow-up. This case illustrates the difficulty of attributing flash pulmonary oedema to unilateral atherosclerotic renovascular disease in the context of long-standing hypertensive heart and kidney disease and highlights how laterality, kidney size, and differential function can guide the choice between selective revascularisation and conservative management.

Indexed as

cardiorenal syndromeflash pulmonary oedemapickering phenotyperenal artery stenosisrenovascular hypertension

Identifiers

PMID41466909
PMCPMC12744519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.