ArticleNeural regeneration research2026
Intranasal therapies for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial hibernation: A new technique for protecting neural tissue and organs.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is the leading cause of brain injury in term infants worldwide and disproportionately affects low- and middle-income communities. Therapeutic hypothermia, the standard of care for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in high-resourced settings, has no effect on morbidity and increases mortality after hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in low- and middle-income settings. Intranasal administration offers the opportunity to deliver more accessible treatments for all babies with neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy due to lower resource needs, ease of administration, and the capacity to directly target the brain. We reviewed preclinical literature concerning intranasal treatments for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and developed a novel semi-quantitative index ranking intranasal therapies for their potential for further development as biologically plausible, effective, and accessible treatments for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed articles on intranasal therapies for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy using the mesh phrases "Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy intranasal" and "Neonatal brain intranasal." Sixty-two studies were included that described thirty-four unique intranasal therapies. Neonatal intranasal therapies have been widely studied in small animal models, infrequently in large animals, and only recently in human clinical trials. Our semi-quantitative ranking revealed cell-based therapies as potentially the most effective and developed intranasal therapy in animal models of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, though the pharmaceutical support compulsory to current cell-based treatments limits their accessibility in low-resourced settings. Intranasal therapies for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy have both feasibility and neuroprotective potential for safe, effective, and accessible treatment of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Additional research is needed for translation to humans. Future investigation should emphasize appropriate animal modeling with pharmaceutics and cells, combined with an evaluation of the brain connectome and neurobehavioral outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.