ArticleJAMA network open2025
Oral Medications for Treating Agitation in a Safety Net Emergency Department.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dexmedetomidine in The Treatment of Toxicologic Conditions in The Emergency Department: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Best-practice guidelines recommend oral medications for treating agitation in the emergency department (ED). However, there is limited study of their use in the ED, especially in the setting of drug and alcohol intoxication. Objective: To evaluate the implementation of oral medications to treat agitation in an ED in which intramuscular medications were standard and to increase the use of oral medications to treat agitation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study analyzed 2 populations. First, all ED patients in an urban level 1 adult and pediatric trauma center from January 1, 2018, to May 31, 2024, were studied to compare the preintervention and postintervention periods. Second, during the 12-month implementation period from September 16, 2020, to August 31, 2021, patients were prospectively observed in an area of the ED dedicated to caring for patients with drug and alcohol intoxication. Exposure: Oral medications to treat agitation, including olanzapine and lorazepam, were encouraged via education and real-time feedback for ED staff. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving their first sedating medication via the oral route. Secondary outcomes included data on time to adequate sedation and adverse drug events. Results: Of 460 600 ED encounters (median patient age, 38 years [IQR, 27-55 years]; 57.8% men; 184 050 [40.0%] before the intervention, 276 550 [60.0%] after), the proportion of patients receiving any sedating medication was similar between time periods (11.8% before intervention vs 11.5% after). The proportion of patients receiving their first sedating medication via the oral route increased after the intervention (7.2% vs 31.4%; difference, 24.2 percentage points [pp] [95% CI, 23.6-24.8 pp]). Among 1178 patients receiving sedating medications during implementation (860 [73.0%] with alcohol intoxication; median breath or blood concentration, 0.22% [IQR, 0.16%-0.28%]), 630 (53.5%) were offered oral medication, of whom 446 (70.8%) accepted it. Time to adequate sedation was 15 minutes (IQR, 7-33 minutes) for oral and 15 minutes (IQR, 9-26 minutes) for intramuscular medications (median difference, 1 minute [95% CI, -0.6 to 2.6 minutes]). There were no significant differences between routes in rates of additional rescue medications (oral, 31.8%; intramuscular, 28.4%; difference, 3.4 pp [95% CI, -2.0 to 8.8 pp]) or adverse drug reactions (oral, 2.7%; intramuscular, 1.1%; difference, 1.6 pp [95% CI, -0.1 to 3.3 pp]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this quality improvement study, emergency physicians successfully adopted oral medications for treating agitation, primarily from intoxication. No difference was found in time to adequate sedation when oral or intramuscular medications were used as primary therapy. These data support best-practice guidelines that suggest oral medications should be first-line treatment for agitation in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.