ArticlePloS one2025
Engagement and retention in HIV care in rural Southern U.S. using an All-Payer Claims Database.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to HIV care is a persistent challenge in rural settings. Arkansas has one of the highest proportions of rural residents in the U.S., yet data on statewide engagement and retention in HIV care are limited. This study used the Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), a longitudinal database of medical, pharmacy, and enrollment claims from Medicaid and most commercial insurers, to evaluate the HIV care continuum and spatial access to providers. We identified people living with HIV (PLWH) from 2013-2017 using an algorithm requiring ≥2 HIV diagnosis claims or ≥1 prescription for antiretroviral therapy (ART). Engagement in care was defined as ≥1 CD4 or viral load (VL) test in a calendar year, while retention was defined as ≥2 tests in a year. Geospatial accessibility to HIV care at the county level was assessed using ArcGIS. A total of 5,033 PLWH in Arkansas were identified across the 5-year period. Only 18-21% of this population received CD4 testing and 47-51% received VL testing annually. ART prescription fills ranged from 61-88% annually. HIV testing rates among the broader insured population were also low, particularly in rural counties. There were 92 unique physicians with HIV-related care claims during the study period, equating to approximately 1 provider per 50 PLWH. Spatial access and care engagement were lower in rural counties. Significant gaps exist in HIV care engagement and retention in Arkansas, with notable gender and rural/urban disparities. Targeted interventions are crucial to address these disparities and end the HIV epidemic in the state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.