Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469753›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025

Routinely collected data: a path to assess safety of human mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation in randomized controlled trials.

Amir Hossein Norooznezhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amir Hossein NorooznezhadMedical Biology Research Center, Health Technology Institute, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Sorkheh Ligeh Blvd, P.O. Box 67145-1673, Kermanshah, Iran. norooznezhad@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) are currently at the center of interest in many randomized and non-randomized clinical trials. According to the data, the number of trials on hMSCs has increased rapidly over time. However, the safety of this treatment, despite some available evidence, remains questionable. Routinely collected data (RCD) has become a helpful approach for gathering clinical data, especially in clinical trials. This method of data collection has helped investigators overcome the limitations of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), such as ensuring long-term follow-ups. Herein, the potential role of RCD in investigating the safety of hMSCs in RCTs, particularly concerns about their possible pro-tumorigenic potential, is discussed. The patterns of recent trials in this field suggest high feasibility and the potential for using RCD for this purpose.

Indexed as

Data CollectionMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansCancerHuman mesenchymal stromal cellsPro-tumorigenic potentialRoutinely collected dataSerious adverse events

Identifiers

PMID41469753
PMCPMC12754955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.