ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning helps predict early onset psychosis with serum protein biomarkers, neuropsychometry, and clinicodemographic data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early-onset psychosis presents diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical presentations and complex comorbidities, typically requiring specialized tertiary care with extensive neuroimaging, neuropsychometric testing, and multidisciplinary evaluation. This case-control study investigated whether machine learning could integrate multiple diagnostic modalities to create an objective diagnostic framework for early-onset psychosis. We recruited 45 patients with early-onset psychosis and 34 healthy controls from a tertiary referral centre. Participants underwent comprehensive assessment including serum protein biomarker analysis (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, proBDNF, p75 neurotrophin receptor, S100B), neuropsychometric testing (Iowa Gambling Task, Simple Response Time, Zabor Verbal Task), and demographic evaluation. Four machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, XGBoost) were trained on five feature combinations using nested cross-validation with hyperparameter optimization. XGBoost demonstrated superior performance, achieving optimal classification with the complete multimodal dataset (accuracy: 0.91 ± 0.08, precision: 0.92 ± 0.08, area under curve: 0.97 ± 0.04). Feature importance analysis revealed cognitive measures, particularly Zabor Verbal Task errors and response time parameters, as most discriminative, with brain-derived neurotrophic factor pathway components showing highest biomarker importance. Machine learning effectively integrated neuropsychometric and protein biomarker data for high-accuracy early-onset psychosis classification, with multimodal approaches outperforming single-domain assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.