Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469826›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2025

Feasibility study of unsupervised anomaly detection using Wasserstein GAN in SPECT image.

Ryosuke Kasai, Hideki Otsuka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryosuke Kasai *Department of Medical Imaging/Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, Tokushima, 770-8509, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-1642
Hideki Otsuka *Department of Medical Imaging/Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, Tokushima, 770-8509, Japan. hideki.otsuka@tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-6099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we constructed an anomaly detection system based on the Wasserstein generative model in brain single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images, and conducted a basic study on the feasibility of the system.

methodsThe proposed method used a Wasserstein generative adversarial network approach based on optimal transport theory. Anomaly detection was performed using only healthy images, and based on the anomaly score calculated from the loss function. Theoretical validation was performed using a numerical phantom which simulated medical image with varying image noise and signal levels. The results were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC). Brain SPECT images from clinical scenarios were used to investigate the feasibility of this system through subtraction images and various quantitative evaluations.

resultsThe numerical phantom showed the relationship between the noise and signal values of the system, and the anomaly detection ability based on the anomaly score value indicated an AUC of 0.9994. The correlation between the anomaly score and the anomaly image was confirmed in the brain SPECT image, and the detection region was clearly observed in the difference image.

conclusionWe proposed and investigated the feasibility of an anomaly detection system based on the Wasserstein generative model. Its effectiveness is expected to reduce the workload of human operators.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionMachine learningSingle photon emission computed tomographyWasserstein distanceWasserstein generative adversarial networks

Identifiers

PMID41469826
PMCPMC12864569

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.