ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Explainable extratreeclassifier model for early detection of type 2 diabetes: evidence from the PERSIAN Dena Cohort.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Postoperative Vomiting Within 24 Hours Using Machine Learning With Large Language Model-Enhanced Interpretability: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning revealing the impact of mental and physical health on arthritis.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based framework for predicting hypertension using serum hematological factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of a prediction model for infectious mononucleosis using machine learning algorithms based on blood cell analysis parameters.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics and Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: From Mechanistic Insights to Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Query-Driven Retinal Layer Segmentation in OCT Using Cross-Attentive Feature Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of Surgical Intervention in Acute Knee Trauma: A Focus on Threshold-Specific Performance and Clinical Decision Utility.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning in bleeding risk assessment for low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux: a predictive model study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Dual-Tracer Imaging and Deep Learning for Real-Time Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Article
- Improved prediction of childhood anemia using hybrid ensemble learning and dual-level explainability.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Machine learning for predicting emergency department visits in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world, multi-institutional study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) develops gradually and often remains undiagnosed until complications emerge. Early detection through transparent machine-learning models can improve prevention and targeted screening. This study developed and evaluated an interpretable Extra Trees Classifier (ETC) for early detection of T2DM within the PERSIAN Dena Cohort, emphasizing probability calibration, fairness, and clinical interpretability.
methodsData from 3,203 adults aged 35–70 years were analyzed. Seventy-nine demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, comorbidity, and biochemical variables were considered; fifteen informative predictors were retained after preprocessing and feature elimination. The ETC was optimized by randomized hyperparameter search and evaluated through ten-fold cross-validation with an additional 80 / 20 internal–external split. Isotonic regression was used to calibrate probability estimates. Model transparency and feature influence were examined using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Morris sensitivity analysis.
resultsCross-validated performance showed mean accuracy 0.69 ± 0.03 and AUC 0.69 ± 0.04, indicating moderate discrimination and stable internal consistency. On the 20% hold-out set, the uncalibrated model achieved AUC 0.67 and F1 0.66. After isotonic calibration, AUC declined to 0.64 and the Brier score increased to 0.48 (slope 0.09; intercept − 1.50), revealing under-confident probability estimates. Excluding fasting blood sugar (FBS) improved performance (AUC 0.77), whereas categorizing FBS into deciles reduced AUC to 0.57. Across sex and age subgroups, AUCs ranged 0.63–0.70 without systematic bias. SHAP and Morris analyses identified FBS, fatty-liver status, age, kidney-stone history, and triglycerides as dominant predictors, with lifestyle factors such as beverage and vegetable intake exerting secondary, modifiable influence.
conclusionsAlthough overall predictive power was limited, the calibrated ETC provided transparent insight into feature interactions, calibration behavior, and data limitations. The framework highlights that interpretability and fairness are as essential as accuracy for trustworthy clinical AI. Future research should expand predictor diversity, address class imbalance, and validate across other PERSIAN cohorts to develop a more generalizable, interpretable model for early T2DM risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.