ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Efficacy of exercise interventions in injury prevention for track and field athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrack and field athletes are at high risk of both acute and overuse injuries, with an incidence ranging from 1 to 30 injuries per 1,000 athletic exposures, due to the diverse biomechanical demands of events like overuse injuries in distance runners, traumatic injuries in jumpers, and upper-limb injuries in throwers. Exercise-based interventions have demonstrated injury-preventive effects in other sports; however, their effectiveness in athletics remains unclear.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions in preventing sports injuries among track and field athletes by conducting a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus for articles published between 2012 and 2025. The final search was performed on January 1, 2025.
methodsA total of 2410 records were retrieved and 10 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Studies involving track and field athletes (P) exercise-based injury prevention interventions (I) compared with a control group (C) reporting injury incidence risk or rate (O) and employing an RCT design (S) were included. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 employing a random-effects model to calculate pooled rate differences with 95% confidence intervals. Study quality was evaluated using the Physiotherapy EvidenceDatabase scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 .0 tool to assess methodological rigor and potential bias.
resultsTen RCTs were included. Interventions included strength training, neuromuscular training, gait retraining, and flexibility or conditioning programs. Only six trials reported statistically significant reductions in injury incidence. Meta-analysis of three eligible studies showed a significant reduction in injury incidence in the intervention group compared to controls (mean difference: -7.63 injuries per 1,000 h; 95% CI: -12.07 to -3.20; p = 0.0007; I² = 88%). Only three studies were eligible for meta-analysis due to consistent outcome reporting in injuries per 1,000 exposure hours.
conclusionExercise-based interventions, particularly strength, neuromuscular, conditioning, flexibility, and gait retraining programs, show moderate-to-strong evidence for reducing injury incidence among track and field athletes. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD420251083247.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.