ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
The covalent docking software landscape: features and applications in drug design.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- CHARMM-GUIbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Open-Source Molecular Docking and AI-Augmented Structure-Based Drug Design: Current Workflows, Challenges, and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Covalent small-molecule ligands have re-emerged as powerful tools in drug discovery, offering prolonged target engagement, enhanced potency, and the ability to modulate proteins once considered undruggable. However, the rational design and virtual screening (VS) of covalent ligands remain challenging. Many docking tools cannot accurately model the energetics of covalent bond formation, often requiring more rigorous quantum mechanical (QM) or semi-empirical QM calculations for reliable predictions. Despite these limitations, the computational landscape is rapidly evolving. An increasing number of open-source, commercial, and web-based platforms now support binding mode exploration, lead optimization, and structure-based VS of covalent ligands. Alongside traditional approaches, new artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools are assisting in prioritizing candidate molecules. This review introduces the fundamental principles and mechanisms of covalent inhibition, then provides a comprehensive overview of computational tools including covalent docking, warhead placement algorithms, and pharmacophore modeling, supporting early-stage drug discovery and chemical biology. Case studies highlight practical applications. We also cover curated databases of covalent binders and experimental 3D protein-ligand complexes, plus tools for assessing nucleophilic residue reactivity, all essential for robust covalent modeling. Finally, we briefly address risks associated with covalent chemistry. While progress is notable, further advances are needed. Nonetheless, today's covalent docking and AI-driven tools already make a meaningful impact by enabling rational design, generating new ideas, refining hypotheses, and expanding the boundaries of druggability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.