Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41470049›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

The covalent docking software landscape: features and applications in drug design.

Natesh Singh, Philippe Vayer, Bruno O Villoutreix

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. CHARMM-GUIbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natesh SinghEvotec SE, Molecular Architects, Integrated Drug Discovery, Campus Curie, 195 Rte d'Espagne, 31100 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-1334
Philippe VayerUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm UMR 1141, Hopital Robert-Debré, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019 Paris, France.
Bruno O VilloutreixUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm UMR 1141, Hopital Robert-Debré, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6456-7730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covalent small-molecule ligands have re-emerged as powerful tools in drug discovery, offering prolonged target engagement, enhanced potency, and the ability to modulate proteins once considered undruggable. However, the rational design and virtual screening (VS) of covalent ligands remain challenging. Many docking tools cannot accurately model the energetics of covalent bond formation, often requiring more rigorous quantum mechanical (QM) or semi-empirical QM calculations for reliable predictions. Despite these limitations, the computational landscape is rapidly evolving. An increasing number of open-source, commercial, and web-based platforms now support binding mode exploration, lead optimization, and structure-based VS of covalent ligands. Alongside traditional approaches, new artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools are assisting in prioritizing candidate molecules. This review introduces the fundamental principles and mechanisms of covalent inhibition, then provides a comprehensive overview of computational tools including covalent docking, warhead placement algorithms, and pharmacophore modeling, supporting early-stage drug discovery and chemical biology. Case studies highlight practical applications. We also cover curated databases of covalent binders and experimental 3D protein-ligand complexes, plus tools for assessing nucleophilic residue reactivity, all essential for robust covalent modeling. Finally, we briefly address risks associated with covalent chemistry. While progress is notable, further advances are needed. Nonetheless, today's covalent docking and AI-driven tools already make a meaningful impact by enabling rational design, generating new ideas, refining hypotheses, and expanding the boundaries of druggability.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsSoftwareAlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsMachine LearningLigandsProteinsADMETAI-powered drug designcovalent dockingdrug discovery

Identifiers

PMID41470049
PMCPMC12753312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.