Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41470633›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Individual Genomic Distinctness of Rice Germplasm as Measured with an Average Pairwise Dissimilarity of Genome-Wide SNPs and Structural Variants.

Yong-Bi Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yong-Bi FuPlant Gene Resources of Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3106-1247

Funding

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada J-003151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The average pairwise dissimilarity (APD) between one plant sample and other assayed samples based on genetic markers was developed in 2006 to assess genetic distinctness and genetic redundancy in a plant germplasm collection. With the availability of abundant genomic variants across a genome, APD can be expanded to measure individual genomic distinctness. This study was conducted to assess the applicability of APD estimates in measuring the individual genomic distinctness of 1789 indica and 854 japonica rice samples based on published genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and structural variant (SV) data. It was found that the acquired APD estimates were weakly or not correlated between the SNP and SV data sets in the indica or japonica samples, respectively. For the indica samples, the APD estimates based on the SNP and SV data ranged from 0.1779 to 0.3277 and from 0.2297 to 0.4096, respectively. For the japonica samples, the SNP-based and SV-based APD estimates varied from 0.1774 to 0.3029 and from 0.1534 to 0.3459, respectively. These APD estimates were highly negatively correlated with the estimates of individual inbreeding coefficients and can identify the most genomically distinct rice germplasm that are compatible with those revealed through principal component analysis. Also, a reliable APD estimation was found to require 5000 to 10,000 random genomic SNPs or SVs. These findings together are significant, not only in demonstrating the informativeness of APD estimates in the identification of individuals with variable genomic distinctness, but also in providing guidance for APD applications to measure individual genomic distinctness.

Indexed as

average pairwise dissimilaritygenomic variabilityindividual genomic distinctnessplant germplasm characterizationsingle nucleotide polymorphismstructural variant

Identifiers

PMID41470633
PMCPMC12737234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.