Evidence mapPaperPMID 41471022Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Dimethyl Fumarate vs. Monomethyl Fumarate: Unresolved Pharmacologic Issues.

Jana Kopincova, Iveta Bernatova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jana KopincovaCentre of Experimental Medicine, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-3783-0724
Iveta BernatovaCentre of Experimental Medicine, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-6120-706X

Funding

the EU NextGenerationEU through the Recovery and Resilience Plan for Slovakia under the project No. 09I03-03-V04-00427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) has established a significant position among therapies for multiple sclerosis and psoriasis and is now being investigated for repurposing to many other non-malignant diseases. Despite decades of preclinical research, some issues about its pharmacology remain unresolved, with ongoing debate over which of the methyl esters of fumarate, whether DMF or monomethyl fumarate (MMF), is the active ingredient. It is generally accepted that DMF undergoes enzymatic hydrolysis to MMF and methanol. However, there is disagreement regarding its exact site, its extent, and the responsible enzyme(s). The enzymatic mechanisms, particularly the roles of carboxylesterases-1 and 2, vary across tissues and species, complicating the translation of in vitro and in vivo preclinical findings into clinical practice. In addition, the impact of DMF and MMF is often not clearly distinguishable and sometimes overlaps, making the true molecular mediators of therapeutic and side effects unclear. Thus, the interpretation of some results obtained in studies is inconsistent because of interchanging of in vitro and in vivo observed features of fumarate esters: while DMF demonstrates rapid and strong effects in cell culture studies, including nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) function activation and glutathione depletion, these observations may not exactly reflect systemic pharmacology and physiology dominated by MMF. Moreover, methanol, the co-product of DMF metabolism, may contribute to the observed DMF effects through increased production of reactive oxygen species, which could result in activation of NRF2-dependent mechanisms. This review highlights specific unresolved issues in DMF metabolism, which are sometimes overlooked.

Indexed as

carboxylesteraseDMFglutathioneKEAP1MMFNRF2repurposing

Identifiers

PMID41471022
PMCPMC12736242

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.