Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471024›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

A Cursory Gaze at Solitary Radiopharmaceutical Chelators Incorporating Macrocyclic and Acyclic Moieties.

Stephen Ahenkorah, Danni Ramdhani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen AhenkorahDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa Healthcare, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3632-829X
Danni RamdhaniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno km 21, Jatinangor 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-9854-5735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiopharmaceutical development usually requires chelators to route radiometals to specific cancer targets. However, there is no universal chelator. To reduce off-target side effects, new chelators are needed as the radiometal toolset grows. DOTA is the most often used chelator for radiometals in radiopharmaceutical development, however DOTA's extreme conditions make it unsuitable for labeling heat sensitive biological vectors. The ideal chelator should be thermodynamically and kinetically stable, allowing labeling under mild conditions (~37 °C). In recent years, new hybrid chelators with enhanced characteristics have emerged, warranting further investigation for medical applications. This paper aims to discuss some of these promising chelators.

Indexed as

3p-C-DEPA3p-C-NETAacyclic chelatorschelating agentschelatorshybrid chelatorsmacrocyclic chelatorsradiopharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID41471024
PMCPMC12736426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.