Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471197›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Innovations in Biofilm Prevention and Eradication in Medical Sector: An Integrative Review.

Konrad Niedźwiadek, Magdalena Polak-Berecka, Adam Waśko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Konrad NiedźwiadekDepartment of Biotechnology, Microbiology and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Skromna 8, 20-704 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-1768-8547
Magdalena Polak-BereckaDepartment of Biotechnology, Microbiology and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Skromna 8, 20-704 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-8610
Adam WaśkoDepartment of Biotechnology, Microbiology and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Skromna 8, 20-704 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9329-1043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofilm-associated infections remain a major challenge in modern medicine due to their high resistance to antibiotics and immune defences. Advances in materials science, chemistry, and nanotechnology have led to the development of innovative, non-antibiotic approaches to prevent or eradicate biofilms.

methodsThis review summarises antibiofilm strategies reported between 2020 and 2025, grouped into chemical, enzymatic, physical-photonic, nanomaterial-based, and biological hybrid categories.

resultsChemical methods such as silver-based chemical systems, nitric oxide donors, and biosurfactants disrupt bacterial membranes, generate reactive oxygen species, and inhibit quorum sensing. Enzymatic coatings with DNase I or lysostaphin effectively reduce

conclusionsRecent antibiofilm innovations mark a transition from conventional antibiotics to multifunctional and adaptive systems integrating chemical, enzymatic, and physical mechanisms for effective biofilm control on medical surfaces.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsHumansNanostructuresSilverStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsSilverantimicrobial surfacesbacteriophage-based strategiesbiofilm eradicationenzymatic coatingsmedical device infectionsnanotechnologyphotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID41471197
PMCPMC12735767

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.