ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Fault Diagnosis of Mechanical Bearings Based on Transfer Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intelligent fault diagnosis is a set of methods for the health monitoring of mechanical bearings. To address the problem of insufficient applicability of diagnostic models due to differences in the domain distribution between laboratory data and actual working conditions, this study constructs a complete transfer learning diagnostic system. Firstly, the Hilbert transform technique was introduced to extract time-domain and frequency-domain features, as well as periodic correlations and other indicators; then, three models, i.e., transfer learning (TL), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and random forest (RF), were used to classify the data and compare their accuracy. It was found that TL had the highest accuracy in testing, with an F1 score of 0.9631. In the transfer task of the target domain samples, compared with the direct application of the source domain model with a classification accuracy of 70.3%, the transfer learning method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.6%, and the transfer gain increased by 27.3 percentage points, proving the superiority of the model constructed in this paper. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to provide a detailed explanation of the transfer learning model, and the basis for model decision making was revealed through feature importance analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.