Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471991›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2025

Microbial Community Analysis and Environmental Association in Cave 6 of the Yungang Grottoes.

Shangxiao Qiao, Zeao Wang, Runping Zhang, Yu Wang, Cen Wang, Guoming Gao, Jiao Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shangxiao QiaoYungang Academy, Datong 037007, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1713-3614
Zeao WangKey Laboratory of Archaeomaterials and Conservation, Ministry of Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
Runping ZhangYungang Academy, Datong 037007, China.
Yu WangKey Laboratory of Archaeomaterials and Conservation, Ministry of Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
Cen WangKey Laboratory of Archaeomaterials and Conservation, Ministry of Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
Guoming GaoKey Laboratory of Archaeomaterials and Conservation, Ministry of Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
Jiao PanKey Laboratory of Archaeomaterials and Conservation, Ministry of Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-3864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Yungang Grottoes, a World Heritage Site, face biodeterioration risks. This study analyzed microbial communities in five microenvironments within Cave 6 using high-throughput sequencing (16S/18S rRNA). Communities showed high microenvironment specificity. Ascomycota and Proteobacteria dominated fungi and bacteria, respectively. Areas near the lighting window, with high external interaction, showed the highest diversity, while red pigment areas, likely under heavy metal stress, had the lowest diversity. Human-associated microbes (e.g., Escherichia-Shigella, Malassezia) indicated anthropogenic pollution on statue surfaces. Core microbiome and functional prediction (PICRUSt2) suggested high biodegradation risk in dust accumulation and inter-statue areas, enriched with organic-degrading and acid-producing taxa (e.g., Rubrobacter, Cladosporium). Microbial distribution and function were driven by openness, substrate, and human impact. This study identifies key risk zones and informs targeted conservation strategies for the Yungang Grottoes.

Indexed as

bioweatheringcultural heritage conservationhigh-throughput sequencingmicrobial communityYungang Grottoes

Identifiers

PMID41471991
PMCPMC12736119

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.