Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472244›Full record

ReviewViruses2025

Optical Density-Based Methods in Phage Biology: Titering, Lysis Timing, Host Range, and Phage-Resistance Evolution.

Stephen T Abedon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen T AbedonDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Mansfield, OH 44906, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9151-2375

Funding

The impact of bacteriophage therapy on wound infection dynamicsR01AI169865 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel J Wozniak · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI169865Public Health Service, USA R01AI169865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than a century ago, bacteriophages (phages) were discovered as entities that could both replicate and dramatically reduce bacterial culture turbidities. By the late 1940s, phage impact on broth turbidity was being studied using electronic detectors. This review examines such turbidimetric, also known as colorimetric or optical density means of studying phage biology. The focus is especially on relatively rapid and higher throughput phenotypic phage characterization versus methods that rely instead on phage plaques, spots, or genotype determinations. Topics covered include (i) the most probable number method along with Appelmans' approach, (ii) estimation of phage growth parameters including especially that of phage lysis timing, (iii) consideration of lysis inhibition as a complicating factor, (iv) phage titering based on degrees of optical density change, (v) detection of both lysis from without and resistance to lysis from without, (vi) phage host-range determination, and (vii) study of post-lysis culture grow back, that is, of bacterial evolution of phage resistance. Based on over 30 years of experience using and studying optical density approaches to the exploration of broth-culture phage biology, the author takes a critical look at both the benefits and limitations of this increasingly common approach to phage biological characterization.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesHost SpecificityBacteriaBacteriolysisbacteriophage therapylatent periodlysis profileMPNphage organismal biologyphage therapyresistance suppression

Identifiers

PMID41472244
PMCPMC12737510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.