Evidence mapPaperPMID 41472732Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Nanovaccines in gastrointestinal cancers.

YuHan Wang, Peng Huang, Chun Li, ShengJin Tu, Hua Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

YuHan WangDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Peng HuangDivision of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chun LiDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
ShengJin TuDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Hua YangDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract rank among the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide, posing a heavy burden on public health. Therapeutic tumor vaccines have garnered significant interest due to their ability to promote tumor regression, eliminate minimal residual disease, create enduring immune memory, and minimize non-specific adverse effects. Recently, the integration of nanotechnology into cancer immunotherapy, particularly through the development of nanovaccines, represents a transformative approach to treating GI cancers. This review outlines the significant advancements in the design and application of nanovaccines, emphasizing the mechanisms by which these nanovaccines deliver tumor-specific antigens and immunostimulatory adjuvants, ensuring effective activation of immune responses. Despite the promise these innovative therapies hold, challenges remain, including efficient antigen delivery, safety concerns, and the complexities associated with regulatory compliance. This comprehensive analysis highlights the potential of nanovaccines in transforming treatment paradigms for GI cancers while underscoring the need for collaborative efforts to accelerate their clinical translation.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsNanoparticlesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyNanovaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesNanovaccinesgastrointestinal cancersimmunotherapynanomedicineprecision medicinevaccine

Identifiers

PMID41472732
PMCPMC12745439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.