Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472841›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference)2025

Using Under-Represented Subgroup Fine Tuning to Improve Fairness for Disease Prediction.

Yanchen Wang, Rex Bone, Will Fleisher, Carole Roan Gresenz, Jean Mitchell, Wilbert van der Klaauw, Crystal Wang, Lisa Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanchen WangGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-7822-7163
Rex BoneGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, U.S.A.ORCID 0009-0000-2778-9783
Will FleisherGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-3970
Carole Roan GresenzGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-7381-7914
Jean MitchellGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-4624
Wilbert van der KlaauwFederal Reserve Bank New York, New York, NY, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-7977-3342
Crystal WangFederal Reserve Bank New York, New York, NY, U.S.A.ORCID 0009-0003-2970-0887
Lisa SinghGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-2970

Funding

Using Digital Signals from Credit Data for Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR01AG080623 · NIA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CAROLE R GRESENZ · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
Accessing the Early Vulnerability of Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease to Adverse Financial OutcomesR56AG053272 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI GRESENZ, CAROLE R · 2018 to 2018
$700k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080623NIA NIH HHS R56 AG053272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of artificial intelligence is growing in healthcare and disease prediction. Because of its potential impact and demographic disparities that have been identified in machine learning models for disease prediction, there are growing concerns about transparency, accountability and fairness of these predictive models. However, very little research has investigated methods for improving model fairness in disease prediction, particularly when the sensitive attribute is multivariate and when the distribution of sensitive attribute groups is highly skewed. In this work, we explore algorithmic fairness when predicting heart disease and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). We propose a fine tuning approach to improve model fairness that takes advantage of observations from the majority groups to build a pre-trained model and uses observations from each underrepresented subgroup to fine tune the pre-trained model, thereby incorporating additional specific knowledge about each subgroup. We find that our fine tuning approach performs better than other algorithmic fairness fixing methods across all subgroups even if the subgroup distribution is very imbalanced and some subgroups are very small. This is an important step toward understanding approaches for improving fairness for healthcare and disease prediction.

Indexed as

Disease PredictionMachine Learning FairnessModel Fine TuningMultivariate Sensitive Attribute

Identifiers

PMID41472841
PMCPMC12746336

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.