ArticleBiomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference)2025
Using Under-Represented Subgroup Fine Tuning to Improve Fairness for Disease Prediction.
Article in Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing health equity in proactive health management: from data underrepresentation and algorithmic bias to a closed-loop governance framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of artificial intelligence is growing in healthcare and disease prediction. Because of its potential impact and demographic disparities that have been identified in machine learning models for disease prediction, there are growing concerns about transparency, accountability and fairness of these predictive models. However, very little research has investigated methods for improving model fairness in disease prediction, particularly when the sensitive attribute is multivariate and when the distribution of sensitive attribute groups is highly skewed. In this work, we explore algorithmic fairness when predicting heart disease and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). We propose a fine tuning approach to improve model fairness that takes advantage of observations from the majority groups to build a pre-trained model and uses observations from each underrepresented subgroup to fine tune the pre-trained model, thereby incorporating additional specific knowledge about each subgroup. We find that our fine tuning approach performs better than other algorithmic fairness fixing methods across all subgroups even if the subgroup distribution is very imbalanced and some subgroups are very small. This is an important step toward understanding approaches for improving fairness for healthcare and disease prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.