Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472882›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Integrating natural language processing and genome analysis enables accurate bacterial phenotype prediction.

Daniel Gómez-Pérez, Alexander Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel Gómez-PérezCellular and Organismic Networks , Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 82152  Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9938-9444
Alexander KellerCellular and Organismic Networks , Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 82152  Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-3634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding microbial phenotypes from genomic data is crucial for studying co-evolution, ecology, and pathology. This study presents a scalable approach that integrates literature-extracted information with genomic data, combining natural language processing and functional genome analysis. We applied this method to publicly available data, providing novel insights into predicting microbial phenotypes. We fine-tuned transformer-based language models to analyze 3.83 million open-access scientific articles, extracting a phenotypic network of bacterial strains. This network maps relationships between strains and traits such as pathogenicity, metabolism, and biome preference. By annotating their reference genomes, we predicted key genes influencing these traits. Our findings align with known phenotypes, reveal novel correlations, and uncover genes involved in disease and host associations. The network's interconnectivity provides deeper understanding of microbial communities and allowed identification of hub species through inferred trophic connections that are difficult to infer experimentally. This work demonstrates the potential of machine learning for uncovering cross-species gene-phenotype patterns. As microbial genomic data and literature expand, such methods will be essential for extracting meaningful insights and advancing microbiology research. In summary, this integrative approach can accelerate discovery and understanding in microbial genomics. Ultimately, such techniques will facilitate the study of microbial ecology, co-evolutionary processes, and disease pathogenesis to an unprecedented depth.

Indexed as

BacteriaGenome, BacterialGenomicsNatural Language ProcessingMachine LearningPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID41472882
PMCPMC12746109

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.