Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473156›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Interactive interfaces and wearable technologies for enhancing health management among older adults: a systematic review.

Chenghong Cen, Hairong Peng, Xinru Li, Zhuoxian Zhang, Jiaqi Hu, Zikai Wang, Tan Jiang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chenghong Cen *School of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Hairong Peng *School of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinru LiSchool of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuoxian ZhangSchool of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaqi HuSchool of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Zikai WangSchool of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Tan JiangSchool of Fine Arts, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Population aging has intensified the need for innovative approaches to support health and well-being among older adults. Interactive interfaces and wearable technologies have been proposed as promising tools for enhancing engagement in digital health management, yet evidence regarding their effectiveness and adoption remains inconsistent. Objective: This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize current evidence on the types of interactive interfaces and wearable technologies used with older adults, their impact on health engagement and management, and the barriers affecting adoption. Methods: This study conducted a mixed-methods systematic review to synthesize empirical evidence on interactive interfaces and wearable technologies for older adults. Two reviewers (A and B) independently screened and appraised all records, with a third reviewer (C) resolving disagreements. Database searches were conducted between January 2021 and August 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL. A total of 1,474 records were identified, of which 101 full-text articles were assessed, and 48 studies met inclusion criteria. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and employed the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality assessment. Thematic analysis was applied to extract and integrate findings across diverse study designs. Results: Five categories of technologies were identified: commercial wearable devices, custom-built systems, mobile health platforms, age-friendly interface designs, and immersive or alternative modalities. These technologies influenced health engagement through four main pathways: usability and ease of learning, self-monitoring and adherence, motivational support, and psychosocial empowerment. Nevertheless, multiple barriers constrained adoption, including usability limitations, low digital literacy, privacy and trust concerns, and financial and sustainability challenges. Quality assessment revealed considerable methodological variability, with only a subset of studies achieving high rigor. Conclusion: Overall, the findings demonstrate that while interactive interfaces and wearable technologies can empower older adults in managing their health, their broader impact depends on user-centered design, training and support mechanisms, transparent data practices, and equitable access models. The review provides an integrative framework that connects interface and wearable design to health management outcomes, offering practical guidance for inclusive and sustainable digital-health innovation for aging populations.

Indexed as

health managementhealthy aginginteractive interfacesolder adultswearable technologies

Identifiers

PMID41473156
PMCPMC12745480

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.