ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Determining the driving factors shaping genetic architecture of complex traits in recently admixed populations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the genetic architecture of complex traits in admixed populations remains challenging due to heterogeneous genetic backgrounds and demographic histories. Mischaracterizing admixture can bias genetic association estimates and limit the generalizability of biomedical findings. Here, we systematically evaluate how evolutionary forces-including admixture, natural selection, and demographic history-jointly shape complex trait architecture and influence genome-wide association study (GWAS) outcomes using a simulation-based framework complemented by empirical analyses. We model five human admixture scenarios and vary the correlation between causal variant effect sizes and selection coefficients to reflect different trait-fitness relationships. This framework enables simulation of complex trait phenotypes with environmental variance, allowing comprehensive assessment of GWAS power and fine-mapping precision across evolutionary contexts. We find that GWAS power is strongly modulated by both genetic architecture and demographic history. Traits with weak coupling between fitness and effect size, such as anthropometric traits, exhibit higher GWAS power than traits under stronger negative selection, including early-onset diseases. Because rare variants contribute substantially to heritability yet are poorly captured by GWAS, bottlenecked populations with fewer rare variants show enhanced power. Despite large differences in GWAS power, fine-mapping precision remains relatively consistent across traits and populations, improving primarily in regions of high recombination. Empirical analyses of diverse cohorts, the All of Us Research Program, support these patterns. Our findings highlight how evolutionary and demographic forces shape the genetic basis of complex traits in admixed populations and underscore the need for tailored study designs to improve GWAS accuracy and fine-mapping performance in diverse cohorts.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.