ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Differential expression analysis in single cell and spatial RNASeq without model assumptions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene up(down)regulation findings in single cell and spatial RNASeq can be inconsistent despite remarkable progress in technology. False findings in high-quality samples raise concerns about assumptions behind widely accepted data analysis approaches. We therefore propose a weighted averaging approach for data analysis without assuming anything besides randomness of technical noise. This approach is closely related to prior work on statistics of cluster-randomized experiments. We show that weighing transcript counts based on measured noise variances and utilizing weighted rather than standard unweighted tests reduces both false positive and false negative findings. Our approach eliminates the need for parametrizing data distributions and/or rescaling transcript counts, which may cause artifacts by distorting and biasing the data. The resulting analysis is less complex and produces more consistent differential gene expression estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.