ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Nutrient Intake Evidence in the Pacific: A Scoping Review of Research Coverage, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction to "Nutrient Intake Evidence in the Pacific: A Scoping Review of Research Coverage, Challenges, and Opportunities".Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Nutrient Intake Evidence in the Pacific: A Scoping Review of Research Coverage, Challenges, and Opportunities.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs) face a growing burden of malnutrition and diet-related noncommunicable diseases. Yet, nutrient intake among Pacific populations remains unclear. This scoping review explores the available literature of macro- and micronutrient intakes among PICTs. Scholarly database searches and targeted web searches were conducted to capture sources reporting nutrient intake from 16 PICTs. Screening and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers, with results analyzed descriptively. Fifty-one sources were included in the review. Papua New Guinea and Samoa were the most represented PICTs, while no relevant data from Nauru, Niue, and Tuvalu was identified. Dietary intake of infants and children was examined in 27% of sources, whereas women were the focus of investigation in only seven studies (13.7%). Common dietary assessment methods utilized were food frequency questionnaires, 24-h recall surveys, and food records. Micronutrient intake was disproportionately reported in the literature compared with macronutrients (captured in 30% and 90% of sources, respectively). Our review highlights the scarcity of research on nutrient intake among PICTs, especially within nutritionally vulnerable groups-women and children. While nutrition research in the Pacific is increasing, alongside greater use of the Pacific Nutrient Database (PNDB) supporting analysis of region-specific foods, the PNDB lacks nutrient composition data for key micronutrients (folate, iodine, and vitamin D), which were consequently the least-reported nutrients in the literature. Expanding dietary intake research in the Pacific, particularly among under-represented groups, women and children, is essential to identify nutritional gaps and inform evidence-based nutrition policies and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.