Evidence mapPaperPMID 41473679Full record

ReviewMedicine international

Fluid biopsies for

Senem Aslan Öztürk, Nergis Özlem Kiliç, Duygu Kütük, Çağri Öner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Senem Aslan ÖztürkDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Maltepe University, 34857 İstanbul, Turkey.
Nergis Özlem KiliçDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Maltepe University, 34857 İstanbul, Turkey.
Duygu KütükDepartment of In-vitro Fertilization, Medical Park Hospital, 35230 İzmir, Turkey.
Çağri ÖnerDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırklareli University, 39100 Kırklareli, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive fluid biopsies are emerging as a promising, low-risk complementary method to traditional diagnostic approaches in reproductive biology, allowing for repeated sampling throughout different stages of assisted reproductive technology. These approaches hold significant potential, not only for clinical diagnosis, but also for personalized medicine. The present review summarizes recent findings on key biomolecular components found in accessible body fluids, such as follicular fluid, embryo culture medium, uterine secretions and saliva, namely cell-free nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles and microRNAs. These biomarkers indicate critical cellular events, such as apoptosis, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and intercellular signaling pathways. Special emphasis is placed on the molecular profile of granulosa and cumulus cells, which are essential for oocyte maturation and have strong predictive value for fertilization potential and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Their molecular signatures provide critical information about the developmental competence of the oocyte and early embryo. However, limitations such as maternal contamination, mosaicism and variable compliance, along with a lack of guideline-level approval, currently restrict their routine clinical use. These non-invasive samples are valuable complements to current invasive methods, providing information about chromosomal competence and embryo viability without compromising embryo integrity. Overall, the current evidence highlights the potential of fluid-based biomarker discovery to improve the outcomes of

Indexed as

embryo culture mediumextracellular vesiclefollicular fluidnon-invasive biomarkersreproductive diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID41473679
PMCPMC12746058

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.