ReviewSurgery in practice and science2025
Integrating Laplace's law with patient-specific hemodynamics to predict rupture risk in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review of a biophysical and computational framework.
Review in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review aimed to synthesize the literature on integrating biophysical principles such as Laplace's law with patient-specific hemodynamics to create a more precise and mechanistic framework for assessing rupture risk in unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published between January 2010 and December 2024 were identified from databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were used to assess study quality and bias. Results: These studies showed increasing integration of Laplace's law with patient-specific flow simulations and vessel wall modeling. Hemodynamic models frequently revealed that areas with low wall shear stress or high oscillatory shear index overlapped with regions of high mechanical stress. Thin walled blebs small outpouchings on aneurysms were particularly prone to rupture and were often associated with abnormal flow patterns and higher wall tension. The synthesized evidence supports the conceptual validity of an integrative model that spatially correlates high wall tension with adverse hemodynamic patterns. Conclusion: This review demonstrates that the proposed integration of Laplace's law with advanced hemodynamic modeling, as evidenced by the literature, holds promise for improving rupture risk prediction. Future research should focus on implementing this combined approach in a clinical cohort to compare its predictive ability against existing models like the PHASES score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.