Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473898›Full record

ReviewSurgery in practice and science2025

Integrating Laplace's law with patient-specific hemodynamics to predict rupture risk in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review of a biophysical and computational framework.

Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Noman Shah, Bipin Chaurasia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad Mohsin KhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Noman ShahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur 44200, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review aimed to synthesize the literature on integrating biophysical principles such as Laplace's law with patient-specific hemodynamics to create a more precise and mechanistic framework for assessing rupture risk in unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published between January 2010 and December 2024 were identified from databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were used to assess study quality and bias. Results: These studies showed increasing integration of Laplace's law with patient-specific flow simulations and vessel wall modeling. Hemodynamic models frequently revealed that areas with low wall shear stress or high oscillatory shear index overlapped with regions of high mechanical stress. Thin walled blebs small outpouchings on aneurysms were particularly prone to rupture and were often associated with abnormal flow patterns and higher wall tension. The synthesized evidence supports the conceptual validity of an integrative model that spatially correlates high wall tension with adverse hemodynamic patterns. Conclusion: This review demonstrates that the proposed integration of Laplace's law with advanced hemodynamic modeling, as evidenced by the literature, holds promise for improving rupture risk prediction. Future research should focus on implementing this combined approach in a clinical cohort to compare its predictive ability against existing models like the PHASES score.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI)Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)Finite Element Analysis (FEA)Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI)Intraluminal PressureJoanna Briggs Institute (JBI)Laplace’s LawLow Shear Area (LSA)Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI)PHASES ScorePreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)RadiusRelative Residence Time (RRT)Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I)Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH)Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography (3DRA)Time-Averaged Wall Shear Stress (TAWSS)Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA)Wall Shear Stress Gradient (WSSG)Wall TensionWall Thickness

Identifiers

PMID41473898
PMCPMC12746268

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.