Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474484›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

A guide to network analysis, multi-omics integration, and applications in livestock microbiome research.

Lionel Kinkpe, Ahamba I Solomon, Yurui Niu, Naqash Goswami, Chinyere Mary-Cynthia Ikele, Di Hu, Rauan Abdessan, Hu Zhigang, Wang Xia

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lionel KinkpeDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China.
Ahamba I SolomonDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China.
Yurui NiuDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China.
Naqash GoswamiDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China.
Chinyere Mary-Cynthia IkeleIntegrated Germline Biology Group Laboratory, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Di HuDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China.
Rauan AbdessanDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China.
Hu ZhigangDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China. huzg2017060@163.com.
Wang XiaDepartment of Animal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, China. xiawang@nwafu.edu.cn.

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-42-2)National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFD1300300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function of the livestock gut microbiome in driving animal growth, health, and methane emissions is controlled by networks of interactions among microbes. A major challenge is to move beyond simply listing microbial members to understanding these interaction networks, which determine how the community functions as a whole. This review synthesizes how network analysis, combined with multi-omics data, can meet this challenge. We focus on the critical task of identifying keystone species, the disproportionately influential microbes that direct processes like fiber digestion and immune function, yet are often missed by standard surveys. We evaluate a progression of methods, from identifying correlated species to building models that integrate genomic, metabolic, and host data. This integration is key to separating true ecological relationships from statistical noise and to linking microbial presence to function. We highlight how computational techniques like metabolic modeling and machine learning are turning networks into predictive tools. Finally, we outline the path forward: field-ready studies that track microbiomes over time, the development of livestock-specific metabolic models, and analytical standards that will allow research to translate into practical strategies. The goal is to provide a framework for using network science to actively manage the microbiome, enhancing sustainable livestock production.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenomicsLivestockMicrobiotaAnimalsComputational BiologyMachine LearningMultiomicsDeep learningKeystone speciesLivestock microbiomeMulti-omics dataNetwork analysis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.