Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474485›Full record

ReviewAmbio2026

Catalysing transformational change through compound nature connectedness interventions.

Matt Pritchard, Philip Tovey, Phoebe Tickell, Tom H Oliver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matt PritchardSchool of Biological Sciences, Health and Life Sciences Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK. m.c.pritchard@reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7803-5651
Philip ToveySchool of Biological Sciences, Health and Life Sciences Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK.
Phoebe TickellSchool of Biological Sciences, Health and Life Sciences Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK.
Tom H OliverSchool of Biological Sciences, Health and Life Sciences Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Political, economic and technological interventions are struggling to address the polycrisis at the necessary scale and pace. Increasing nature connectedness can make a critical contribution: there is abundant evidence that higher levels of nature connectedness are not only good for health and happiness, but also correlate with a greater commitment to pro-environmental behaviours. The early progress in the scientific study of nature connectedness is impressive, but there are many types of interventions promoting nature connectedness, and evidence is fragmented across academic disciplines and siloed communities of practice. Here, we review a wide range of interventions and their effectiveness relative to each other. We appraise how interventions can be combined synergistically with the potential to catalyse shifts to pro-environmental mindsets through a concept of compounding effects. We conclude by discussing how our insights may inform the development of more holistic training and development approaches, as a critical element of sustainability transformations.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesCompounding effectsMindset changeNature connectednessNature interventionsPolycrisis

Identifiers

PMID41474485
PMCPMC13319648

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.