ArticlePloS one2025
Sex-related differences in single- and multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: Insights from the Netherlands Heart Registration.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Sex-related differences in long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Sex-related differences in conduit strategy and early outcomes after sternum-sparing on-pump multivessel CABG via left anterior thoracotomy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women are known to suffer from increased mortality and major adverse cardiac events rates after coronary artery bypass grafting compared to men. This study gives an overview of sex-disparities in grafting strategy and outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in the Netherlands, and compares survival of the younger population undergoing multi-arterial grafting. Data were gathered retrospectively from the Netherlands Heart Registration database. Patients undergoing isolated after coronary artery bypass grafting were divided into groups treated with single or multi-arterial grafting. Using risk adjusted cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the effect of sex on the revascularization strategy and postoperative outcomes was assessed. Secondary analysis was conducted on a subset of patients aged 70 years or younger at baseline. The study included 51137 patients, of which 19.1% was female. When compared to men, women were older and suffered from more comorbidity. Female sex was independently associated with less multi-arterial grafting. While multi-arterial grafting led to a lower repeat revascularization rate in men (p = 0.022), this was not the case in women. Cox regression analysis did not independently associate the female sex with inferior survival. In the younger population, a survival benefit was observed after multi-arterial grafting, to the point where survival did not differ between sexes. Women receive fewer arterial grafts as opposed to men. In a younger patient population, the survival difference between sexes disappears when patients are treated with multi-arterial grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.